Doctrine · The Articles of Religion
Article XIX — Of Both Kinds. The cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the lay people; for both the parts of the Lord's Supper, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be administered to all Christians alike.
well-settled
What it says
“The cup must not be withheld from lay people; Christ commanded both bread and cup for all Christians alike.”
- The stake
- No two-tier sacrament — laity and clergy receive the same Supper, by Christ's plain command.
- Why it matters
- It is the eucharistic form of the priesthood of all believers, and another dispute the other communion has largely conceded.
- The Wesleyan take
- Pure Wesley: 'Drink ye all of this' means all. The leveling of the table is the leveling of the whole Methodist movement — one condition, one rule, one cup.
- Original English
- The cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the lay people; for both the parts of the Lord's Supper, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be administered to all Christians alike. Thirty-Nine Articles Article XXX (1571), 'Of Both Kinds,' kept by Wesley verbatim. Its target was the medieval Western practice of communion in one kind (the bread) for the laity, the cup reserved to the clergy. The ground is dominical command ('Drink ye all of this,' Matthew 26:27). ¶104 footnote 4 lists Article XIX among XIV–XXI for ecumenical reading — and here, as with the vernacular, the dispute has substantially closed: post-Vatican II Catholic practice widely restores the cup to the laity.
| Version | Rendering |
|---|---|
| United Methodist Book of Discipline (¶104) | The cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the lay people; for both the parts of the Lord's Supper, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be administered to all Christians alike. |
| Thirty-Nine Articles (1571), Article XXX | The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the Lay-people: for both the parts of the Lord's Sacrament, by Christ's ordinance and commandment, ought to be ministered to all Christian men alike. kept verbatim by Wesley; *Book of Resolutions* #3144 governs its ecumenical reading. |
patristic ·roman catholic ·reformed ·wesleyan ·modern ecumenical
Article XIX — Of Both Kinds
The Text
Article XIX is one sentence with a sharp social edge: “The cup of the Lord is not to be denied to the lay people; for both the parts of the Lord’s Supper, by Christ’s ordinance and commandment, ought to be administered to all Christians alike.” Its sixteenth-century target was communion in one kind — the medieval Western practice of giving the laity the bread only, reserving the cup to the celebrating clergy. The article’s ground is not preference but dominical command: Christ said “Drink ye all of this.” Wesley kept it verbatim. Beneath the eucharistic specifics is a principle the whole Wesleyan movement embodies: there is no two-tier Christianity, not even at the rail.
Translation Notes
“not to be denied to the lay people… to all Christians alike.” The operative word is alike. The article does not merely permit lay reception of the cup; it forbids any distinction between clergy and laity at this point. The Supper is the same for all who come.
“by Christ’s ordinance and commandment.” The authority cited is not the church’s discretion but Christ’s explicit institution (Matthew 26:27, “Drink ye all of it”; 1 Corinthians 11:25–28). This is Article V (Scripture sufficiency) applied: a practice that denies what Christ commanded cannot be required of the church.
Historical Context
The withholding of the cup from the laity (communion sub una specie) developed in the medieval West and was defended at the Council of Constance (1415) and reaffirmed by Trent. The Reformers saw in it both a contradiction of Christ’s plain command and a clericalization of the sacrament — the same instinct as the vernacular article (XV). Article XXX of the Thirty-Nine is the English Reformation’s correction.
As with the vernacular, this is a polemical article whose grievance has substantially closed. The Second Vatican Council and subsequent Catholic practice widely restored communion under both kinds to the laity. ¶104’s footnote places Article XIX under the 2016 Resolution of Intent: the ecumenical reading here is again less “soften an attack” than “notice the convergence” — both communions now ordinarily give the cup to all.
Lines of Interpretation
The disputed question is no longer the cup but its principle: what else, in church life, quietly recreates a two-tier sacrament or a clerical reserve?
Patristic
Tradition: the universal cup of the early church
The early liturgies gave both elements to all the baptized; one-kind communion is a medieval Western development. The article restores antiquity.
Strengths
- Grounds the article in catholic practice, not Protestant novelty
- Frames it as conservative restoration, like the vernacular
Weaknesses
- Practical exceptions (the sick, the infant, scarcity) existed even early; “alike” needs pastoral nuance
- Antiquity’s reasons were not only the dominical-command argument the article foregrounds
Roman Catholic
Tradition: Constance/Trent (one kind sufficient); concomitance; Vatican II’s restoration
Rome’s defense was the doctrine of concomitance (the whole Christ present under either kind, so one kind is not deprivation), with the cup later restored as fitting, not strictly necessary. The article presses dominical command against the withholding.
Strengths
- Names honestly that the article rejected a real Roman discipline
- Concomitance is a serious argument the bare article does not engage
Weaknesses (of the dispute)
- Vatican II’s restoration of the cup substantially concedes the article’s pastoral point
- “Christ’s ordinance and commandment” remains a strong scriptural case the concomitance argument answers only obliquely
Reformed
Tradition: the sufficiency of Christ’s institution; the priesthood of all believers
The Reformed reading ties Article XIX to Articles V and to 1 Peter 2:9: the church may not subtract from Christ’s institution, and the common cup enacts the priesthood of all believers.
Strengths
- Connects the article to a coherent principle (no addition to or subtraction from institution)
- Surfaces the ecclesiological stake: no sacramental clergy/laity caste
Weaknesses
- “Priesthood of all” overpressed can flatten legitimate ordered ministry the Articles elsewhere assume
- The institution-only argument needs the realism of Article XVIII to avoid mere proceduralism
Modern / Ecumenical
Tradition: convergence; the principle applied past the cup
The modern reading: the specific dispute is largely healed; the permanent principle is that nothing should recreate a two-tier sacrament or reserve grace to an elite.
Strengths
- Keeps a “won” article alive by generalizing it
- Models the Resolution of Intent: hold the principle, rejoice in the convergence
Weaknesses
- The generalization is homiletical; the article’s letter is narrow
- “No elite” can be misapplied against all order rather than against clerical reservation
Wesleyan Voice
Article XIX is small but it rhymes with the largest Wesleyan theme: the leveling of the table. “Drink ye all of this” is, for Wesley, of a piece with the one condition of the General Rules (a desire, required of all), the Third Rule’s ordinances commanded to all, and Catholic Spirit’s refusal of spiritual castes. Wesley’s movement was a democratization of grace — lay preachers, lay class leaders, the gospel to colliers and servants — and the common cup is that instinct at the sacrament’s center. The article keeps Article XVIII’s realism (the cup is “a partaking of the blood of Christ”) and refuses to ration it: the deepest means of grace is given to all Christians alike, not banked behind the rail.
The Wesleyan extension is the article’s question turned on the present church. The cup is no longer withheld; but the principle — no two-tier sacrament, no reserve of grace to an elite — still indicts subtler clericalisms: a communion practice that functionally excludes the disabled, the homebound, the child, the stranger, the unsure. Wesley communed the seeker (Article XVIII); he would press Article XIX’s “to all Christians alike” against any modern fencing that quietly recreates the one-kind instinct in new form. The article’s letter is settled; its spirit is a permanent test of whether the table is as wide as Christ’s command.
Hymnody
The Wesleyan eucharistic hymnody (the 1745 Hymns on the Lord’s Supper) assumes the whole cup for the whole church — there is no hymn anywhere in it contemplating a withheld chalice. “Come to the supper, come, sinners, there still is room” and “Sinners, obey the gospel word… come to the gospel feast” are Article XIX’s “all… alike” sung as invitation: the table’s defining note is room and all, never reserve. The songbook’s eucharistic generosity is the article’s principle in praise.
Pastoral and Liturgical Use
The first pastoral use is gratitude and generalization. Teach the article’s history as a healed wound — the cup, like the vernacular, is now common to both communions — so the congregation learns to hold a doctrinal point without tribal triumph. Then apply its principle: where, now, does this church reserve grace to an in-group? The article is the warrant for an open, accessible, genuinely common table.
The second use is the leveling, preached. Article XIX is the sacramental form of the priesthood of all believers and of the whole Wesleyan refusal of spiritual elites (Articles XI, XIX; the General Rules’ single condition for all). The pastoral application is to let the common cup teach the congregation what it means: at this table no one outranks anyone; all receive the same Christ alike.
Further Reading
- Matthew 26:27 (“Drink ye all of it”); 1 Corinthians 11:25–28 — the dominical command
- 1 Peter 2:9 — the priesthood of all believers
- Thirty-Nine Articles, Article XXX (1571) — Wesley’s source; Book of Resolutions #3144
- The Council of Constance (1415); Trent; Vatican II — the practice’s history and substantial healing
- The Supper’s doctrine: [[articles-of-religion/article-18-of-the-lords-supper]]
- The same leveling principle: [[general-rules/the-nature-of-a-society]]
- The cognate “for the people” article: [[articles-of-religion/article-15-of-speaking-in-the-congregation]]